Red light cameras are a menace, but Aurora wants more of them...
Police have received the green light to explore adding red light cameras at as many as 25 intersections over time.
...
"The police department didn't drive this program, but now that it is here, it has proven to be effective in reducing accidents," said Police Chief Daniel Oates. "We think there's a value to taking the program to the next step."
...
City records show the injury-accident rate dropped by 60 percent at one location from 2005 to 2006.
However, rear-end accidents skyrocketed at three intersections, including Mississippi and Potomac (up 175 percent) and Alameda and Abilene (up 100 percent), from 2005 to 2006.
Critics say that red light camera enforcement is being abused by cities to "shake down" drivers for revenue. Aurora is among 334 cities and towns nationwide using red light cameras.
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/mar/26/more-red-light-cameras-for-aurora/
So exactly how has this program been effective when it has increased rear end accidents? The city can find one intersection where accidents were reduced (probably due to an external factor and not due to these cameras), and can find 3 where accidents increased. The only thing these have accomplished is generating more revenue for the city. This is a total shakedown. The majority of evidence shows that cameras have little effect on traffic safety and one prominent study shows an increase in accidents at intersections that have red light cameras. Several cities have been caught intentionally making the intersections less safe by reducing yellow light time as a way of increasing revenue. I don’t know if Aurora has been guilty of this, but it probably only a matter of time. They will not want to see increased compliance as that would mean a loss of revenue.
For further reading on the subject:
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/14/irony-red-light-cameras-a-safety-impediment/
http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/mar/12/na-red-light-cameras-increase-accidents-usf-study-/
Recent Comments